Friday, December 30, 2011

Lecture Six- Sculpture in the Expanded Field

Sculpture in the Expanded Field


*Laocoon- Gotthold Ephriam Lessing
 An essay upon the limits of painting and poetry, Noonday Press, New York, 1957
-Visual arts are static, unlike poetry that slowly reveals a narrative. A sculpture is physical and you can perceive it in an instant. Sculpture is separate from other media, such as poetry that deals with time.
-identifies sculpture with the idea of monument. It is symbolical.



*Bronze equestrian statue of the emperor Marcus Aurelius, Piazza del Campidoglio, Rome
-Statues are related to where they are placed.
-She claimed that the sculpture served to link the government, which met in the surrounding buildings to the government of ancient Rome.
-Krauss notes “Because they function in relation to the logic of representation and marking, sculptures are normally figurative and vertical, their pedestals an important  part of their structure, as they mediate between the actual site and representational sign”

*Auguste Rodin (different versions of) Monument to Balzac, 1891.
-Numerous versions. No original and the creator has made no real attempt to create s huge likeness.depiction of Balzac.
-More individualistic, deemed a failure at the time. Was a commission but was thought to say more about the artist and his art practise.

*1891- Sculptures began to change- traditional forms were lost.

*Constantin Brancusi, The Beginning of the World, 1920.
and The Cock, 1924
-Extreme example- closed down, self contained 
-sculpture and plinth merge and inform one another. Pared down- very loose representation.

*Pablo Picasso, Guitar, 1914
-Rather than being self-contained and enclosed in one skin it was multi-part constructions. Cubism brought this idea of using multi-parts.
*Julio Gonzalez, Monsieur Cactus, 1939 and Naum Gabo, Head No. 2  1916, enlarged version 1964 are examples of this.

*Anthony Caro, Early One Morning, 1962
and Sun Feast 1969-70

-Drew upon cubist structure. All different elements of structure held in relation with one another.
-There is a sense of different sculptural elements joined, but spaces- a senses of empty paces within the elements.

*Specialised environments were created known as 'white cube' galleries. Uniform, white spaces where art can be shown under controlled lighting. Bare minimum in the room and every reference to the outside has been closed down.
-Within post-war America 'White Cube' became the used format. A uniform white wall is something we can set aside and focus upon the artwork.



*Brian Doherty 'Inside the White Gallery'. The art is isolated and distributed within a space that 'codes' them as art. Eg. Urinal by Duchamp
-These art objects seem to exist out of time- atmosphere and focused concentration.
-An early example os the Museum of Art in New York and is a format we have used up to the present day.

*Kenneth Noland, Pan 1969
Jules Olitski, Lysander-1, 1970
-Both of these show a range of colour rather than an actual image. Still retains a sense of pictorial illusion- optical third dimension and indeterminate colour field. 

*Donald Judd, Untitled 1968

-This sculpture is independent from it's context. 3D makes the space surrounding the piece part of the experience. 
-It is suspended on the wall, linear and with a feeling of depth. Does not engage with colour field, but just bluntness of metal.
-Judd did not call himself a sculptor but an object maker.

*Michael Fried “Art and Objecthood”, in Art and Objecthood, (Chicago: University of Chicago Press)
-Fried claimed that the work of Anthony Caro suspended its objecthood by marrying “illusion and structural obviousness
- Fried argued that minimalist artworks were theatrical. Through this term he sought to draw attention to how minimalist works confronted the beholder with their physical presence, whilst emphasising, in contrast, to the instantaneous and entire presence of modernist art.
-He also argued that encounters with minimalist works were impoverished because they went on and on indefinitely, offering no point of culmination. 


*Robert Morris, Green Gallery Installation, 1968
*Modernist work. Does not even give the sculptures a context. What is in the room that is not really the room? 
-Not architecture, but not sculpture, it is sat somewhere between the two.
- Several different cuboid forms engaging with the gallery in different ways.

*Robert Morris, Mirrored Cubes 1965/71
-Work copies cuboid shape of gallery and viewers through use of mirrors. Viewers have three experiences- own body, walls and the piece.

*Michael Asher, Not Title, Installation at Pomona Art gallery, 1970
-Manipulation of shape and structure of gallery. Work that refers to the idea of the architecture enclosure.

*Richard Long, A Line Made By Walking, 1967
and A Line in the Himalayas, 1975.

-Marking journey of artist. Walking= exploring relations between time, distance, landscapes and bodily movement.

*Hans Haacke, Germania 1993
-Repressed history. Trauma within German culture. Sense of anxiety and repression.
-       
Conclusion
The development of this expanded field depended upon a fundamental shift in the perception of artworks that Krauss identifies in relation to a rupture in the “bounded conditions of modernism.” She goes on to consider that “within the situation of postmodernism practice is no longer defined in relation to a given medium – sculpture – but rather in relation to the logical operations on a set of cultural terms, for which any medium – photography, books, lines on walls, mirrors or sculpture  itself might be used.” 
-       
In other words sculpture could no longer be thought of as a privileged entity,  capable of compelling the viewer’s attention, in ways that rendered the context of its presentation an irrelevance.
-        Such sculptures, Krauss contended, now had to be perceived as being held in a state of oppositional tension with its context of presentation, and it was the recognition of this tension throughout the 1960s that, for Krauss, generated the proliferation of practices that she identified with the expanded field of postmodern art practice. 

Friday, December 9, 2011

Lecture Five- Contemporary Art

What is contemporary art?
What is its history and context of production? 

  •  Modernisms (Dada and Duchamp vs. Modernist painting)
  •  Conceptual Art
  •  Postmodernism
  • YBAs- Art in the 1990s
  • Art Now- Themes and Issues in Contemporary Art 
*Damien Hirst, The Physical Impossibility of Death in the Mind of Someone Living, 1991
 ‘Art, when vital, is about setting the teeth on edge, of reminding us that we are alive for a span, and that the ugly and wholly unavoidable fact of death is never very far away. Art is about the beautiful. It is also about the nasty, the unpalatable.’ Michael Glover- Art Critic (Independent)

*Hirst is still in the press- critics debated recently whether he deserved to have a show in The Tate. Already a Millionaire- why does he need to raise his profile through a funded art venue?
*The shark looms at you in a gallery. The shark actually started to deteriorate which raised questions for the audience and the curator- replace the shark? Leave it to decay?
Actually decided to skin the shark and place the skin on a plastic model- so changed from original piece.
Raises questions about DEATH and DECAY.

*Rachel Whiteread, House, 1993
This caused controversy- critics said it was so expensive and in bad taste as it was made during a time when there was housing issues in the UK. The money could have been better spent. 

*Carl Andre, Equivalent VIII, 1966


Minimalism- 1960's. The exhibit comprises one-hundred-and-twenty fire bricks, arranged in two layers, in a six-by-ten rectangle. All eight structures in the series have the same height, mass and volume, but different shapes. Thus they are all "equivalent". 
The Tate bought it in 1972- resulting in controversy within the press because of the perception that taxpayers' money had been spent on paying an inflated price for a collection of bricks.

*Marcel Duchamp, Fountain, 1917.
There is only one remaining photograph of the piece.
It was submitted to the American Society of Independent Artists in 1917 under pseudonym- R Mutt.
*An emergency meeting was held and it was decided to be removed form the exhibition.


MARCEL DUCHAMP,
“The Richard Mutt Case,” (Letter to
The Blind Man, May 1917)


They say any artist paying six dollars may exhibit.
Mr. Richard Mutt sent in a fountain. Without discussion this article disappeared and

never was exhibited.
What were the grounds for refusing Mr. Mutt's fountain:


  1. 1  Some contended it was immoral, vulgar.
  2. 2  Others, it was plagiarism, a plain piece of plumbing.
    Now Mr. Mutt's fountain is not immoral, that is absurd, no more than a bathtub is
immoral. It is a fixture that you see every day in plumbers' show windows. Whether Mr. Mutt with his own hands made the fountain or not has no importance. He CHOSE it. He took an ordinary article of life, placed it so that its useful significance disappeared under the new title and point of view—created a new thought for that object.
As for plumbing, that is absurd. The only works of art America has given are her plumbing and her bridges. 


*Marcel Duchamp, Bottle Rack
Another example of an everyday object bought and turned into art.
*Duchamp, The Large Glass, The Bride Stripped Bare by her Bachelors, Even, 1915-1923
*Experimentation with contemporary art- identity, performance art and gender performance = Marcel Duchamp as Rrose Sélavy.


‘A point which I want very much to establish is that the choice of these “readymades” was never dictated by esthetic delectation. This choice was based on a reaction of visual indifference with at the same time a total absence of good or bad taste….in fact a complete anesthesia.’ Marcel Duchamp, “Apropos of Readymades”, 1961

*Bruce Nauman, Self Portrait as a Fountain 1966-67

From Modernism to Post-Modernism.....What Happens Next?

*Modernism= roughly 1880-1960
*'High Modernist Art' aimed to 'hunt' art down to its medium.
*New forms of abstract art emerging in the 1940's- 1960's.
*Abstract Expressionism (action painting/colour filed painting) and post- painterly abstraction.
*Painters become interested in the characteristics of painting- such as flatness, colour..... art for arts sake.

Abstract Expressionism

*Jackson Pollock, No. 5, 1948
*He was an American painter known for his contributions to the abstract expressionist movement. The painting was done on an 8' × 4' sheet of fibreboard, with thick amounts of brown and yellow paint drizzled on top of it, forming a nest-like appearance.

*Barnett Newman, Who's Afraid of Red, Yellow and Blue?, 1966

*Mark Rothko, The Seagram Murals, 1958

The Tate's website said this about the exhibition they held of the work:
'In the Seagram Murals, Mark Rothko gives traditional oil painting technique a modern twist. The nine paintings chosen by Rothko to hang in a homogenous group at the Tate, reveal their painterly qualities slowly as our eyes grow accustomed to the dim light favoured by the artist for the display of his deep red black and maroon canvases.'

*‘A new kind of flatness, one that breathes and pulsates, is the product of the darkened, value muffling warmth of colour in the paintings of Newman, Rothko and Still. Broken by relatively few incidents of drawing or design, their surfaces exhale colour with an enveloping effect that is enhanced by size itself.’ Clement Greenberg, ‘American Type Painting’, 1955
*'Greenburgian Modernism'
- American art critic, promoted the work of the modernist painters. He can be associated with the concept of Formalism or New Criticism, which became the dominant idea and criteria for ascribing to modern art until the 1960's.
*At this point the limited values of high modernism were critiqued and challenged by the plurality of postmodernism.
*There was an active backlash within art practice, which sought to breakdown the relationship between high and low culture, art and life, and to experiment and innovate.
*This movement of resistance looked back to Duchamp.  

From Modernism To Post-Modernism

*We can, therefore, identify two trajectories of approaches to modernist art making.
*Greenbergian Modernism- Formalism, high culture over low culture, self-referential and medium specific, abstract painting, ‘desire to hunt art down to its medium’, ‘art for art’s sake’- appraisal of values only to be found in art.
*Duchampian- Readymade, performative, criticality- the questioning of authenticity, the role of the art and critic, a move away from the visual to the conceptual, art as idea.
(Amelia Jones: ‘Duchamp as the Father of Postmodernism’) 


*All art (after Duchamp) is conceptual in nature because art only exists conceptually’ Joseph Kosuth, ‘Art after Philosophy’, 1969


*Robert Rauschenberg, Erased de Kooning Drawing, 1953
*Rauschenberg asked de Kooning if he could erase one of his drawings and De Kooning let him. Rauschenberg got this idea from drawings of his own that he had been erasing, and took it to the next level. The drawing that he was erasing had to be art to begin with.  It had to be big.  It took Rauschenberg a month to erase de Kooning’ drawing because of the mediums de Kooning had used.  This piece stems from the idea which is how far can one push art and still get meaning out of it.

*John Latham, Art and Culture, 1966-69
The beginnings of a more expanded art work- suitcase format.

Conceptual Art: Art As Idea

‘…One will have to wait fifty or one hundred years to meet one’s real audience, but it is this audience alone that interests me.’ Marcel Duchamp, 1955

*Conceptual art-1960's/70's
*The emergence of Conceptualism represents a shift away from an emphasis on form and aesthetics to instead consider the ‘thinking process’ central to art making as the essence of art;
*Idea and concept was given priority over the visual or ‘retinal’;
*Idea and concept was also given priority over the materiality of art;
*‘Conceptual artists “have set critic and viewer thinking about what they see rather than simply weighing the formal or emotive impact”’ Lippard and Chandler



'Dematerialisation’

*Art critics Lucy Lippard and John Chandler published an article titled: ‘The Dematerialisation of Art’ in Art International, February 1968.
*Conceptual art thus represents a reaction to commercialism in art, as well as a critical exploration of the role of the artist, critic and audience.
*In 1973, Lucy Lippard published Six Years: The Dematerialisation of the Art Object from 1966-1972.

 Approaches to Conceptualism
*1. A challenge to the ‘visual’ and the status of the art object
*2. Systems, series and structures as concepts for art
*3. Analytical art- language and statements
*4. Institutional critique and museum intervention
*5. Global conceptualism

1. A challenge to the ‘visual’ and the status of the art object:

*Piero Manzoni, Merda d'artista, 1961
*Michael Craig-Martin, An Oak Tree, 1973

*Both drawing on Duchamp- saying object is art- so that makes it art! Do we trust or believe the artist?

2. Systems, series and structures as concepts for art:

*‘In conceptual art the idea or concept is the most important aspect of the work…..The idea becomes a machine that makes art.’ Sol LeWitt, ‘Paragraphs on Conceptual Art’, 1968

*Mark Kelly, Post Partum Document, 1971-79
*Documented in a systematic way the period after her birth; thinking how the child will develop and exploring the role of mother and women within the art world. Development of language.

3. Analytical Art- Language and Statements:

*Mary Kelly also fits here.

*Joseph Kosuth, One and Three Chairs, 1965.
*Semiotic ideas. See him breaking down components that relate to meaning.

*‘Works of art are analytic propositions. That is, if viewed within their context-as-art, they provide no information what-so-ever about any matter of fact. A work of art is a tautology in that it is a presentation of the artist’s intention, that is, he is saying that that particular work of art is art, which means, is a definition of art.’ Joseph Kosuth: Art as Idea as Idea

*Lawrence Weiner, statements (october 12, 1969) Does an artwork need to be made or can we just read a statement and know what it is all about?

4. Institutional Critique and Museum Intervention

*Hans Haacke, Shapolsky et al, Manhattan Real Estate Holdings, A Real-Time Social System, as of May 1, 1971 (1971)
Exhibited in Guggenheim in New York but was closed as museum thought it was using political messages for a political end.

Art in The 1990's: The Young British Artists

*Marc Quinn, Self, 1991
Using his own body material (blood) as a material

*Mat Collishaw Bullet Hole which was on display in the Freeze exhibition.


*Tracey Emin, I've Got it All, 2000

*Something different happening in art world- cult celebrity nature of artist. Huge value ascribed to art.
*1990's british art becomes more accessible
*Idea of 'High Art': Should it really be more accessible?
*Grouping such diverse artists together creates an 'aura' about them?
*Media loved commenting on them and their work- got people talking about their work, mainly through controversy.
*Saatchi gave them their notoriety- during the recession (Thatcherism and recession in 80's/90's) he lost a lot of high art and so took on the YBA's art.

YBA's:

•At Goldsmiths they were taught by conceptual artist Michael Craig Martin
•He is seen to be an influential factor in the development of new forms of creativity seen in their work.
•The label ‘YBA’ was a powerful brand and marketing tool.
•Artists are often associated with controversy, shock value and the rise of the artist-curator.
•The work of the ‘YBA’s is diverse and utilised a range of media.


Sensation: Young British Artists from the Saatchi Collection
Royal Academy of Art, London, 18 September -28 December, 1997
*Shock Value!
*The show generated controversy in London and New York due to the inclusion of images of Myra Hindley and the Virgin Mary. The show consisted of work from the collection of Charles Saatchi. It was criticised by New York mayor Rudolph Giuliani and others for attempting to boost the value of the work by showing it in institutions and public museums

*Myra painting by Marcus Harvey 1995

Art Now: Themes and Issues
Interdisciplinary approaches; post-medium specificity; Relational Aesthetics; interactive and participatory artwork; digital and virtual technologies; globalisation; changes in curatorial practice; art and activism…….

*Nicholas Bourriaud, Relational Aesthetics, 1998
‘A set of artistic practices which take as their theoretical and practical point of departure the whole of human relations and their social context, rather than an independent and private space.’
*Altermodern: Tate Britain, 2009

Conclusions:
We now have: ‘a worldwide system for the production, distribution and consumption of art on a spectacular scale….the art it shows, sells and talks about is non-medium specific ‘conceptual’ postmodernism…..the work of art is, in short, entirely dependent on the institution of the museum for its continued existence.’
Paul Wood, ‘Inside the whale: an introduction to postmodernist art’ in Gill Perry and Paul Wood, ed.
Themes in Contemporary Art, (New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 2004).